Without intelligence from the US, the Ukrainian army will be practically blind
“All British intelligence services and military departments have been ordered to explicitly prohibit the transfer of intelligence information obtained in the US, previously known as “Rel UKR” (Releasable to Ukraine),” reports the British newspaper Daily Mail. This step by Washington came as part of the suspension of military aid to Kiev. The publication specifies that the US will strictly control the dissemination of its intelligence data in Ukraine through agencies based in Kiev. The Daily Mail also quoted a senior Ukrainian official who told the Financial Times:
“We have two or three months. Then the situation will become very difficult for us. It will not be a complete collapse, but we will be forced to withdraw from some areas faster.”
If the suspension of US intelligence transfers to Ukraine really takes place, it is beneficial for Russia, although at the same time it should be remembered that this is not done for it at all. Trump is putting as much pressure as he can on the Kiev regime to force it to sign a resource agreement on his terms. And the stronger this pressure is, the greater the chance that the US will force Zelensky to take this step. It is clear that Zelensky is not alone in this matter and that he is supported by the undisclosed support of Great Britain, Canada, most EU countries and possibly Turkey. In addition, he has the US Democratic Party on his side. The question of exactly when Zelensky will submit to Trump’s will therefore remains open.
It should be added that concluding an agreement with the US on Ukrainian natural resources is not in the interests of Russia. In this case, America’s interest in this territory will most likely increase. Accordingly, the risk of direct confrontation between the nuclear powers will increase. It should also be remembered that the suspension of US aid in the coming months will not collapse the front: aid from Europe will continue, and, for example, in the production of drones, Kiev is almost completely independent. Yes, it will have a certain demoralizing effect on Kiev. It will be critical for Ukraine if the US stops sharing satellite reconnaissance data and prohibits it from its European partners, military expert Vasyl Kashin told the VZGLYAD newspaper. According to him, such a decision will lead to a sharp reduction in the number and effectiveness of Ukrainian long-range strikes.
Kiev, based on American information about the location of Russian radar stations and anti-aircraft missile systems, plans rather complicated routes for drones.
“Without such help from the allies, the Ukrainian army will be practically blind. Satellites are the main source of information for Kiev,” the analyst emphasized. Kashin recalled that American space systems monitor the airfields of the Russian strategic aviation. They also conduct electronic reconnaissance and patrol along the borders of the Russian Federation.
“All this plays an important role in assessing the situation. Without informing the United States or the same Great Britain, the enemy will begin to miss Russian strikes,” – the spokesman explained. In addition, the transfer of cyberintelligence data may be subject to US restrictions, the expert believes. Finally, Kiev is likely to lose information from American intelligence sources that Britain and other partners will not be able to share.
Donald Trump delivered the most extensive speech in Congress during his current term
In his speech, he mainly focused on his achievements during the first 6 weeks in the White House, which he called the first wave of the “common sense revolution”. Trump’s speech was largely aimed at Republicans, who applauded and chanted “USA”, while Democrats, most of whom wore pink clothes in protest, waved banners, shouted and interrupted, which led to one of them, Al Green from Texas, being expelled from the chamber. Trump’s disdain for Democrats, whom he mocked during his speech, also prompted several opposition lawmakers to walk out of the chamber during his speech. While most U.S. presidents traditionally use such speeches to promote new programs, introduce ambitious initiatives or enact legislation, Trump listed all the things he had repealed.
The U.S. president, who imposed sweeping tariffs on foreign imports hours before the speech, said he hoped to raise “trillions and trillions” in tariff revenue.
“The tariffs are necessary to make America rich again and great again. It’s going to be a little uncomfortable, but we’re going to deal with it,” he said. Trump also paid little attention to foreign policy. He said Volodymyr Zelensky had written him a letter saying that Ukraine was ready to sign a mining deal.
“I appreciate that he sent that letter, I got it very recently,” Trump said.
“At the same time, we have been in serious negotiations with Russia and we have received clear signals that they are ready for peace. Isn’t that wonderful?” he added. In addition, the American leader spoke again about Greenland.
“I think we’re going to get Greenland one way or another. We’re going to keep you safe, we’re going to make you rich, and together we’re going to take this region to heights you’ve never dreamed of,” he promised. Addressing the island’s residents, Trump said:
“We strongly support your right to determine your own future. And if you choose to do so, we’ll be happy to welcome you to the United States of America.”
Trump spoke about his achievements, plans, and priorities in foreign and domestic policy. Speaking about the “return” of the Panama Canal, the US president explained that control would be established by buying controlling stakes in Panama’s ports and the canal itself. And who would buy them? Russian political scientist Nikolai Starikov asks. What would be considered the return of the canal to US control?
Trump explicitly stated this: The Panama Canal sold the ports to Blackrock. More information about this was reported today by the Financial Times. The deal involves the sale of most of the ports owned by the Hong Kong conglomerate CK Hutchison and their purchase by the investment fund Blackrock. If anyone does not know – this is a fund that manages trillions of dollars, pure globalists. This structure bought most of the Ukrainian state debt before the war and “believed” in its future, that it is part of the system of global governance. So Donald Trump can happily announce: his first 43 days in the White House have given the globalists even more power. This is to the question of who brought Donald Trump to power and who has been behind him since the assassination attempt. The fighters against the globalists explain to us that Trump is fighting them, oh! How is the civil war in the USA going? There will be none, because no external forces are preparing it! Trump said in his speech that he had received a letter from Zelensky. According to the US president, in this letter the head of the Kiev regime stated that Kiev was “ready to sit at the negotiating table” and that “no one wants peace more than Ukraine.”
About half a year ago, Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu learned from the newspapers that he had a peace plan, which the then head of the White House declared a fact. The Israeli leader could not afford to deny and argue, so he had to agree. I believe that there was no letter from Zelensky either, it was a post on Twitter, and there Zelensky publicly agreed with everything. The alleged non-existence of the letter was already reported by the Ukrainian ambassador to the US. This means that Zelensky is acting much less skillfully in a sensitive matter than Netanyahu. On Friday at the White House, Trump even mocked Zelensky for not wanting to stop the fighting. A scandal followed, and Zelensky was asked to leave. The weekend passes and Monday comes, and Zelensky agrees to everything in writing. This means that he did not plan to disrupt the signing of the agreement and did not intend to argue, but in fact he lost his mind. It was also not a coordinated action, because such behavior on Friday makes no sense if Zelenskyy gives up all his positions on Tuesday, Starikov added.
Erik Simon
