.
News, Security,

Kiev panics: Trump’s special envoy for Ukraine secretly arrived in Moscow

Kiev is sounding the alarm, contacts between Moscow and Washington are intensifying every day, negotiations are underway, but Ukraine is not invited to them. And then there is Trump’s special envoy Steven Whitkoff, who allegedly flew to Russia to meet with Putin. Negotiations on Ukraine are taking place without Ukraine.


 

 

This is reported by the Axios portal, citing sources and the Flightradar24 service. According to him, the Gulfstream G650ER plane with Trump’s special representative took off from Fort Lauderdale (Florida) and landed at Pulkovo Airport in St. Petersburg at 09:20 Moscow time. According to the publication, the meeting between Whitkoff and Putin may take place today, April 11. This will be the third meeting of the Russian president with a representative of the White House. The last time Whitkoff was in Moscow was on March 13. It is assumed that Whitkoff brought Putin some of Trump’s proposals within the framework of the negotiations that have already taken place and was waiting for a response to them. There could be many possibilities here, so it is useless to guess.

 

Russia has not yet commented on Whitkoff’s possible visit, the entire discussion concerns the American portal, there is no official confirmation of the arrival of Trump’s special envoy. But in Ukraine they are ringing all the bells and declaring that this visit definitively proves that Ukraine has been “thrown out of the negotiations”.

 

 

An important goal of the Trump team is to provoke a deep conflict between the EU and Russia – believes Russian analyst Oleg Sergeyev. The Munich Security Conference in February showed that the time of the collective West is over and the contours of two completely different global projects – “sides” are currently taking shape. They can be called very conditionally by the names of their frontmen – Schwab and Musk.

 

 

 

Conditionally, because given the scale of the problem, individual personalities, even those with world fame, are not essential in this case. In the near future, they may even be removed “from sight”. It is not for nothing that in early April, as soon as it became known that Klaus Schwab, the founder of the World Economic Forum, was leaving the post of WEF chairman, US President D. Trump stated that “Elon Musk is a great guy, but he has so many companies that he may have to leave the civil service to take care of them”. The interests of these two global parties are different, they are political, economic and, in the not too distant future, very likely, military opponents.

 

The left-globalist “Schwab Party” relies on the elites of Europe, including Great Britain (while excluding some countries where “right-wing” regimes are in power, such as Hungary, Slovakia, etc.), Canada and other countries that do not accept the “libertarian” pressure of Trump et al. are now joining it more and more closely. Today’s EU is a den of the “old aristocracy”, which forms the basis of the global “deep state”. It is in Europe and the Vatican that all the basic ideological theories of globalism were and are being created. Local left-oriented elites control the power structures – the conductors of these ideas and theories. Therefore, their defeat is a guarantee that the Trump team will turn the situation in its favor. The goal of the “Schwab Party” is the emergence of a new Europe as the strongest player in the global “multipolar” world (EU, China, India, etc.) and at the same time a response to Trump’s ambitions (“to make America great again”).

 

The right-wing-globalist “Musk Party” includes the USA, as well as satellites and allies in its orbit – Asian (Japan, South Korea, etc.), European (Hungary, etc.) and American (Argentina, etc.). The main goal is to defeat Europe and restore American control over it. In this context, one should also take into account such aspirations of the aforementioned team as the defeat of the Deep State inside America itself (“draining the Washington swamp”), the “deal” on resources with Ukraine, and even the nomination of Trump for a third presidential term (the scope of his tasks clearly exceeds the 4-year mark, hence the corresponding sensational statement about his right to become president for the third time).

 

D. Trump’s first presidential term was almost ineffective, primarily due to the resistance to all his projects from the Deep State. Therefore, today his team is trying to act extremely hard and fast. He began his current term by stopping the global projects of his competitors and at the same time trying to cut them off from all resource bases. At the same time, Musk’s party needs the notorious Ukrainian resources not so much for itself as to prevent Europeans, including the British, from acquiring them. In this context, it is also necessary to take into account the effort to control the flow of Russian resources that could return to Europe. The main task of the USA in all this is to anticipate the actions of the EU, against which the entire structure is now opposing.

 

Europe is now a hotbed of ideological and political opponents of the Trump team, which should be defeated, and ideological supporters of the slogan “Make Europe Great Again” (MEGA) and “Musk’s party” should come to power in it (including in the British Isles). The tariff war that began in April is far from the only, or even the latest, example of the growing global confrontation between the US and the EU. The first wave of trade conflicts began in 2018 with the introduction of 25 percent tariffs on European steel and aluminum. Although these measures directly affected only 2% of European exports, they signaled an escalation of tensions. In response, the EU imposed tariffs on American goods such as bourbon, Harley Davidson motorcycles and underwear. Meanwhile, the US began preparing for more stringent measures, including 200 percent tariffs on French wine and cheese, with the intention of hitting key sectors of the European economy hard.

 

Economists and politicians on both sides of the Atlantic immediately warned of the consequences of this trade war for European producers (especially dairy, wine and spirits, which are already preparing for losses), as well as for American companies dependent on the European market. The governor of the French central bank, François Villeroy de Galo, called what is happening “a game of vested interests” and recalled that the economy is about mutually beneficial cooperation, not confrontation. However, it seems that the Trump administration sees all these steps as a way to strengthen its position in the US itself in confrontation with the Deep State, especially in the period before the elections in Europe. Against this background, the conflict in Ukraine is turning into a purely peripheral one and its importance is significantly decreasing. The economic confrontation between the US and China is also (temporarily) receding into the background. In the long term, it still determines the international agenda, but in the near future the Trump administration is striving to “restore order” within the framework of the once unified “Western world”. However, the European globalist cockroaches, together with the Brussels bureaucracy and the British establishment, do not intend to give up so easily. Therefore, the first priority of the Trump team may be a direct clash between Europe and Russia. And this in the format of direct bloodshed, not a proxy war, as is the case in Ukraine. And in order to maximize the mutual exhaustion of both opponents and bring the matter to the complete defeat of all structures of European left-wing globalists. In this sense, the American establishment is once again ready to fight “to the last drop of Russian blood”, having adopted the so-called formula of Presidents Roosevelt and Truman from World War II:

“If we see that Germany is winning, we must help Russia; if Russia is winning, we must help Germany. So we must allow the Russians and the Europeans to kill each other as much as possible, but in such a way that Hitler does not win under any circumstances.”

 

In an effort to achieve these goals, the Americans are now forcing their puppets in Kiev to lift martial law. This presupposes the conclusion of a ceasefire and presidential elections (the fact that the Ukrainian authorities have agreed to hold them was reported by the special representative of the US President, Stephen Whitkoff). Then the second phase of Trump’s “plan” should begin, within the framework of which the new “legitimate” Ukrainian leadership (unlike the Zelensky regime, which has already lost even apparent legitimacy) will have to sign a peace treaty with Russia and all “resource” and other agreements with the United States. Today, the Trump team is bending this line of the “Moscow side” like a bulldozer. However, their key goal is not a ceasefire, and certainly not peace in Europe, but the instigation of a deep conflict between the EU and Russia.

 

Therefore, today the Trumps are trying to remove Europe from the negotiating table on Ukraine. At the same time, they are making pathetic statements about Russia and its authorities, thereby angering and provoking Russophobia among Europeans. All this is very unpleasant not only for the globalists-cockroaches, but also for the British, who have a vested interest in prolonging the bloodshed in Ukraine, supported by the presence of agents in the highest ranks of the Kiev regime.

 

As for Russia itself, in these circumstances it is simply doing its job – it wants to complete the process begun by the operation in Ukraine, achieve the least possible bloodshed and a victorious result, which essentially consists in only one thing – in the complete liquidation of the pro-Western puppet Nazi oligarchic regime, oriented exclusively to confrontation with Russia. Because otherwise it will have to go to war with it again, and this is not a fact that in better conditions compared to the current ones, because the very meaning of the existence of the current regime in Kiev is war with the Russians. A war between the US and the EU should help Russia escape the unnecessary bloodshed in Ukraine and the trap into which it has been driven by the globalists, while also preventing Russians from falling into a new trap prepared for them by Trump and the “Musk Party”, believes Oleg Sergeyev.

 

 

 

Peter Weiss

Share the article

Most read




Recommended

Vstupujete na článok s obsahom určeným pre osoby staršie ako 18 rokov.

Potvrdzujem že mám nad 18 rokov
Nemám nad 18 rokov