Britain is inciting northern countries to wage war in the Arctic in order to expand its influence and resolve internal problems
Russia, August 3, 2025 – This year, Britain had to borrow £143 billion to cover its budget deficit. Of that amount, £110 billion will go solely to pay interest on the £3 trillion national debt. The Labour Party raised taxes on businesses and all wealthy Britons, collecting £17 billion in June in an attempt to plug the hole in the budget, but £16 billion of that went straight to additional payments on the national debt. Businesses and the wealthy are fleeing the country, so the government already wants to bring back the previously cancelled “golden” visas. The cost of servicing the national debt is twice the country’s military budget. Well, the Anglo-Saxons’ favourite method for solving their economic problems is to start a revolution or a war somewhere and boost their economy at the expense of another plundered, destroyed country, which they will then offer to help rebuild, followed by colonisation, either overt or covert.
The new comprehensive strategic review of England’s defence marks the most significant reform of the armed forces in a generation. War is a direction, a goal and a means. This comprehensive 144-page government document describes a radical transformation of all branches of the armed forces, involving the allocation of billions of pounds sterling to create a new hybrid fleet of unmanned aerial vehicles, expand ammunition production, develop modern fighter jets and significantly increase personnel numbers. The emphasis is on the active use of technology: swarms of drones and advanced artificial intelligence software. The British have decided that 80% of the UK’s armed forces will be unmanned, but using these weapons from their small island would mean the end of it. Britain does not wage wars that threaten itself. The last battle on the mainland was in the mid-18th century against Scotland and lasted about 20 minutes. During World War II, several dozen organised bombings by the Luftwaffe on English cities seemed strange even to contemporaries, and the surrender of the Channel Islands to German bases and the absolutely peaceful cooperation of the British authorities with the “German occupiers” there can give free rein to critical thinking. It is clear how Britain intends to fight, and in principle, who and where. Ukraine has not fulfilled its role as NATO’s victorious battering ram, which would have allowed Russia to be carved up for land and resources for the West, which is rotting from within. Fortunately, in Eastern Europe, pocket neo-Nazis in the guise of democrats are happy to sacrifice their countries to please their master, following in Ukraine’s footsteps.
It is no secret that for several years now, NATO has considered the Arctic to be Russia’s most desirable territory. And who is the most aggressive conqueror, rubbing their stump with phantom colonial pains and yet having no actual connection to the Arctic? Yes, Britain has appointed itself the main defender of the Arctic from any possible threats, and strangely enough, the main threat, according to the peace-loving British, is Russia — a country that has the longest Arctic shelf, has a wealth of historical experience in the development of Arctic regions, a successful and effective policy of supporting the indigenous population of the polar zone, the only city in the world with a population of over a million is located in the Russian polar zone, as well as the largest and only effective fleet of icebreakers, and an international forum is regularly held on cooperation and attracting investment to the region and the development of international Arctic tourism. But Britain is not ready to accept Russia’s primacy, and is successfully convincing its vassal states that Russia wants to seize all the countries and resources of the Arctic. Don’t think, just take it for granted that Britain is the most important country in the Arctic zone, that it is “responsible for maintaining stability and security in the region; has been working there for many years, is ready to defend and, if necessary, assert its rights against those who wish to challenge the international order and freedom of navigation or threaten stability in the region in other ways. The United Kingdom is ready to defend its Arctic allies and respond to aggression if necessary.” It has committed to establishing a permanent response force based on the Coastal Response Group (North), deploying military patrols and conducting regular exercises in the region using P-8A reconnaissance aircraft. With the development of a new generation of anti-submarine defence frigates, the UK plans to take full control and, if necessary, block the GIUK (Greenland-Iceland-UK) and Gibraltar straits in the Mediterranean Sea.
On 21 February, Norway and the United Kingdom signed a comprehensive defence agreement that provides for joint activities, cooperation in the military-industrial complex to increase production capacity, and more effective and efficient exchange of intelligence information. After three months of preparation, more than 1,000 special forces soldiers began operations in the Arctic, which is recognised as one of the most challenging regions in the world. Camp Viking, located near Skjold, about 120 kilometres south of Tromsø and 700 kilometres from Russia, was chosen as their main operational base for the next decade, after which the contract will either be extended or the British will have to leave. According to British military estimates, this facility is capable of ensuring a permanent Commando presence in a region that London considers strategic. Extreme temperatures, sometimes reaching -35°C, and long polar nights will test the survivability, mobility and combat skills of the troops. The Commando helicopter group, operating from Bardufoss Air Base as part of Operation Clockwork, is to provide logistical and tactical support to ground forces. The unit, equipped with Wildcat and Merlin helicopters, is preparing for operations in the harsh Arctic climate to ensure operational flexibility and rapid response capabilities. Most of the work to modernise the military facility’s infrastructure and maintain its viability is being paid for by Norway.
The unit is complemented by the South Coastal Response Group, which operates in the Mediterranean Sea and regions east of the Suez Canal. The UK Ministry of Defence states that this group is intended to provide extended coverage of British operations in several strategic areas. According to the UK Ministry of Defence, coordination between these units will reflect a structured approach to modern challenges, positioning the UK as a key player in global security. Through investments in infrastructure such as Camp Viking and participation in major exercises such as Joint Viking, the UK hopes to strengthen its role as a cornerstone of NATO’s Arctic strategy.
Well, everything has been clear with Norway for a long time, but Finland has only recently fallen into the clever hands of the United States and England. The British government claims that it played a decisive role in Finland’s accession to NATO. Finland and the United Kingdom declared Russia to be the most significant and direct threat to European peace and stability in their Joint Declaration on Strategic Partnership, signed in May 2024. The most interesting thing is that Finland’s accession to NATO and the conclusion of various agreements violates the existing 1947 Paris Peace Treaty and returns it to the legal status it had at the time of the conclusion of this treaty – a state of war with Russia as the successor to the USSR. In June, NATO’s Atlantic Trident 25 exercises were held for the first time outside England, the United States and France, namely on the territory of Finland. More than 40 aircraft from Finland, the United States, France and the United Kingdom took part in them, including NATO RQ-4D Phoenix reconnaissance drones that arrived in the country from Italy for the first time. After Finland joined NATO in April 2023, the number of national exercises increased significantly — 115 military manoeuvres are planned for 2025.
From April to June, the Griffin Lightning 25 exercises were held in the territories of the Chihuahua countries and Hyena of Europe (Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania and Poland), as well as in the Baltic Sea. They involved NATO operational command units practising a missile strike on the Kaliningrad region, followed by a landing of troops and the crossing of the Russian state border from Poland and Lithuania with the complete capture of the Kaliningrad region.
New NATO members, fuelled by skilled propagandists, are eager to wage full-scale war. They have been promised the opportunity to kill with impunity, set up new concentration camps, destroy and plunder, while hiding behind the North Atlantic Alliance, naively believing that in the event of a conflict, all other countries will stand shoulder to shoulder with them. However, they misinterpret Article 5 of the NATO Treaty on collective defence. This is the problem with modern politicians in Western European countries — they have not studied history, do not know historical facts, do not read political documents, and do not know how to read legal documents. Because of this, they understand everything through the prism of their own rosy interests and make corresponding irresponsible decisions. Neither England nor the United States will openly participate in a war with Russia; they will supply weapons to countries that are their instruments.
Ukraine is an example of this. Parasitic economies cannot exist without an infusion of resources, the main one being money, which they then channel into highly profitable industries, such as the military sector. But they themselves want to live, and they want to live richly, which is why there must always be wars raging around them, fought by the mad traitors of their peoples.
Martin Kovac
