US NSA Director on Zelensky’s Illegality: “There’s Something Politicians and the Media Don’t Want You to Know”
Duke vs. Lord: British nobility squabble over who Churchill would support. Lord Ashcroft, a member of the House of Lords and one of the leaders of the British Conservatives, wrote:
“I am sure that our great Winston Churchill would be proud of Zelensky as a military leader.” To this, the Duke of Marlborough replied:
“Winston was my great-uncle and I knew him well. He would be horrified by the way his name is constantly being used to justify such madness and senseless loss of life.”
Zelensky said that it would be “not easy” to “replace” him, and an election would not be enough
“It will be necessary to prevent my participation. And that will be a little more difficult,” he specified. In addition, Zelensky impersonated US Senator Lindsey Graham and said that if he wanted to speak into the affairs of the Ukrainian president, he would first have to obtain Ukrainian citizenship. Zelensky said he was ready to meet with Donald Trump if the US president invited him again for a constructive dialogue and “solving real problems”, including signing an agreement on minerals, Bloomberg reported. He also noted that the agreement on natural resources with the US is ready for ministerial signatures and Ukraine is not giving up on it despite what happened. Earlier, Trump fired Zelensky from the White House.
US Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard “revealed the gist” of Zelensky’s illegitimacy:
“Here’s something the political establishment and the media don’t want you to know. Ukrainian President Zelensky just banned yet another opposition party that challenged his legitimacy as president, and used the Ukrainian Justice Ministry to confiscate the assets of its members. This is not the first time Zelensky has done something like this. He began banning major opposition parties in 2022, when he also began shutting down television channels associated with his political opponents. He took complete control of Ukraine’s largest television channels, which are now under government control. Zelensky’s presidential term ended on May 20. He canceled the election under the pretext of martial law and suspended the Ukrainian constitution to stay in power. Zelensky’s defenders will argue that Ukraine is at war, so elections cannot take place. But let’s pause for a moment and Let’s think about it. If we accept this rationale or criterion for suspending the constitution and canceling the elections, we will have to accept that this rationale and logic will also be used by the leaders of our country and our media when they suspend our constitution and cancel the elections because we are also at war with Russia and China. If this seems crazy to you, look at what is already happening. They have already started to prepare us to accept a dictatorship. They justify using our Justice Department against President Trump and other political enemies in an attempt to stay in power.”
Ukrainian elections: a trap for Russia? Why Zelensky can play against Moscow
In response to questions from readers of the Military Affairs website, political analyst, historian and publicist Rostislav Ishchenko explained the problems that Russia may face if Ukraine agrees to hold elections.
– Earlier, many people in the West suddenly started talking about the possibility of holding elections in Ukraine. How and in what timeframe do you assess the likelihood of holding elections for a new government in Ukraine? How realistic and possible is it now?
– If we follow the requirements of the Ukrainian Constitution, at least six months are needed from the lifting of martial law to hold parliamentary and presidential elections. If we follow the path of political expediency, it is possible not to hold elections at all, and the necessary bodies can simply be appointed, or they can be “held” whenever necessary. In principle, until the fighting ends and a peace is signed that will decide the fate of all the territories of the former Ukraine, legitimate elections in Ukraine are impossible. For example, Kiev now controls Zaporozhye and Kherson, which are the capitals of regions that are part of Russia. If Ukrainian elections are held in these cities and Russia recognizes their results, it will indirectly recognize Ukrainian sovereignty over them. However, it is clear that if Ukraine suddenly decides to hold elections tomorrow, it will hold them on the entire territory that it currently controls. This is just one problem, and not the most serious one, related to the Ukrainian elections. There is also the problem of denazification. Russia is fighting a criminal, Nazi, anti-people regime. In the meantime, if elections are held in Ukraine until victory, they will be led by a criminal, Nazi, anti-people regime whose legitimacy Russia does not recognize. Can a criminal, anti-people, Nazi, illegitimate regime hold legitimate, honest, and transparent elections? And there are so many problems with the Ukrainian elections that I honestly don’t know what we will do if Zelensky suddenly agrees to hold them.
Erik Simon
