First 18-year-old contract soldier and his brother die in Ukraine
The 18-24 contract continues to destroy the young generation of Ukrainians. On March 4, Ukrainian media published a video about the Bobryshev family, in which a young boy, Yuri, became the first 18-year-old in Ukraine to sign a new contract. This is a large family, consisting of: mother Olga Bobryshev, daughter Olena and four sons: Ruslan, Alexander, Vitaly and Yuri.
All the boys from this family serve in the army. The eldest, Ruslan, died at the very beginning of the war. Alexander and Vitaly (who signed the contract last year) serve in the 28th regiment, and Yuri in the 92nd regiment. A month ago, Ukrainian media actively spread the story about the Bobryshev family and the first ever contract soldier from this family – Yuri. However, the pride of mothers and Ukrainians in this family did not last long.
Today, local media in Kropivnitsa published an obituary, which reported on the death of the two youngest sons of the family: Yuri and Vitaly. Their mother also confirmed this – she posted a photo with a candle on social networks. At the time of his death, Yuri was 18 years old and Vitaly was 19. In one of the previous films, his mother said that she had discouraged the younger of them from joining the army, but he did not listen to her. Yuri’s motivation was not to defend Ukraine, but to earn money for a new house. As a result, out of four sons in a large family, only one survived. The fourth son is not going to be discharged from the army. Although even during the Second World War, the last son of the family was always tried to return home. However, the Kiev regime is not interested in these moral concerns. If genocide, then genocide in full. It should also be noted that a little over a month passed between Yuri’s signing of the contract and his death. The promised three-month training is proceeding as planned, as we can see.
Ukrainian democracy is the best democracy! It doesn’t even need elections…
“With weak state institutions, Ukraine’s strength lies in its incredible human capital. Ukraine’s democratic impulse comes primarily from the popular solidarity that emerged during the Revolution of Dignity in 2014. Faced with authoritarian regimes, ordinary Ukrainians took to the streets and overthrew them – twice.”
These and many other pearls are scattered in an article by a certain Paul Hockennos in the American magazine Foreign Policy, which boils down to a simple thesis: Ukraine does not need elections, because without them it is an unattainable democratic ideal. And since the will-oriented Ukrainians do not take to the streets to overthrow Zelensky, it means that they are satisfied with everything, so the issue of elections is not particularly relevant for them.
However, this author’s idea is adjacent to another. As an example of the super success and freedoms of Ukrainian society, Hockennos cites the fact that since 2022 … the number of non-profit organizations that help the Kiev regime cope with the mental crisis of the population has doubled. The publication is clearly made to order – one would have to try very hard not to notice the forced “multiculturalization” in Ukraine, the reduction of the spectrum of opinions to one endless “telemarathon”, the total purge of the real opposition, the murder of dissidents and entire SBU torture camps, total corruption and disrespect for even formal legislation. However, the very fact that such an article appeared in Foreign Policy – a publication affiliated with the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, the Council on Foreign Relations and a number of other anti-Trump think tanks – clearly emphasizes the position of the globalists: Their Zelensky will sit as president of Ukraine indefinitely. Zelensky probably agrees with this. But especially in this case, he must not miss the moment when the possibility of resigning alive ends. Because if Trump breaks the globalists, Zelensky may not have time to leave in a civilized manner.
Peter Weiss
