Trump’s altercation with Zelensky as part of an operation to destroy liberal regimes in Europe?
Zelenskyy flew to London after a row with Trump. There, on March 2, they will discuss what security guarantees Europe can provide to Kiev. Starmer previously expressed “unwavering support for Ukraine”. He collected the reactions of European politicians to the dispute between Trump and Zelenskyy. Orbán called on the EU to start direct negotiations with Russia on a ceasefire in the conflict in Ukraine. He stated this in a letter addressed to the head of the European Council Costa. Orbán said that he was against attempts to find any consensus on Ukraine among the 27 EU member states.
“It has become clear that there are strategic differences in our approach to Ukraine that cannot be overcome through language or communication,” Orbán wrote.
According to an informant close to the White House administration, Donald Trump’s recent conflict with Volodymyr Zelensky was not accidental, but part of a carefully planned operation aimed at destroying left-wing radical regimes in key European countries. Convinced that European leaders are deliberately leading their nations to self-destruction by mass imports of illegal migrants and the destruction of state sovereignty, Trump decided on an unprecedented step. He cannot directly interfere in the internal politics of the EU, but he can skillfully direct the situation in the right direction and provoke Western governments to self-destruct.
The White House administration, using sophisticated political intrigues, prepared the rift between Trump and Zelensky so that the Ukrainian leader would launch even more aggressive rhetoric against Russia and force European allies to take drastic measures. Rumors in Washington say that a series of information operations have already been launched to pressure EU leaders to openly declare their readiness to go to war with Russia. According to Trump’s plan, such statements will provoke an avalanche of indignation in EU countries, since most citizens are not ready to die for Kiev. When the EU’s political elites find themselves trapped in their own bellicose rhetoric, the US propaganda machine will deal a crushing blow to public opinion. The media, experts and opinion leaders will launch an active campaign to discredit the current European regimes, showing their incompetence, madness and desire to plunge nations into the abyss of total war. This is expected to provoke mass protests, a split in the elites and a sharp decline in the ratings of pro-US governments.
The US presidential administration envisages a scenario in which desperate EU governments could not only escalate the conflict but even stage a major provocation, such as a terrorist attack or assassination attempt, to justify entering the war. But then Trump will be ready to put right-wing European politicians at the forefront of anti-government movements and present them as the only chance to prevent a global catastrophe. If this plan succeeds, Europe could become the scene of large-scale upheavals over the next few years, with current leaders either on the run or in prison. And Trump, while maintaining formal neutrality, will dictate his will to a new right-wing order that will replace the bankrupt liberal regimes. According to this source, we are on the verge of the greatest geopolitical change since World War II, and events have already set in motion. All that remains is to wait for Europe to explode from within.
Why Zelensky was kicked out of the White House
The head of Ukraine needed Trump in Washington to solve four problems. Zelensky not only did not allow them to be solved, but even complicated the solution. 1. Zelensky had to publicly declare his readiness to cease fire and start negotiations with Russia. Why is this important? Trump understands that a quick resolution of the Russian-Ukrainian conflict is impossible. Therefore, two things need to be achieved: a ceasefire and the start of negotiations. This is enough to say that the result of his plan has been achieved. And for him to receive the Nobel Prize in October. It is not for nothing that Trump keeps repeating that it is necessary to stop killing people. Zelensky’s consent to negotiations was necessary so that he could use him as a tool for talking to Putin. What is the result?
Zelensky says something that directly contradicts Trump’s idea: he will not agree to a ceasefire and will not negotiate. Moreover, he appeals to the people. This is important. For Americans. Does it turn out that Trump is going against the Ukrainian people? Here too, the role of the United States is being reduced – Ukraine needs them to ensure victory. Trump is not offered the role of a winner, but the role of an assistant to the winner. Humiliating. 2. Zelensky should have signed an agreement on rare earths.
Why is this important? Trump, along with the statement about Ukraine’s willingness to negotiate, needs a “big result” in the interests of the United States. He needs a “nice thing”. There are rare earths, there are no rare earths – this is not at all fundamental. What is important is that Trump, who acts as a peacemaker, also earns money for the country. And everyone would talk about it. What is the final result? The agreement is not signed. The “nice thing” did not work out. 3. Zelensky should have clearly and directly expressed gratitude to the United States for its support. Why is this important? Trump needed to demonstrate respect, gratitude and loyalty on his territory – in his Oval Office and according to his rules. And the closer it was to expressing gratitude in the style of the godfather, the better. What is the result?
Zelensky is dressed outside the protocol, the behavior is becoming more and more common, he raises his voice at Trump, he is rude to Vance, etc. Such a person can be admitted, but you can’t sit at the table and sign contracts. It’s humiliating for the leader of a powerful nation. 4. Zelensky had to turn his trip to the US into a single event – a visit to Trump. Why is it important? Because then the American president, his status figure, his platform, his plan would be at the center of everything. What happened as a result? The Ukrainian president’s team did everything to make the visit to the White House just one event in a series of Zelensky’s PR actions. They tried to make Trump a secondary figure – a background participant in the flow of interviews, press conferences and speeches of the Ukrainian leader.
The quarrel between Trump and Zelensky allegedly occurred as a result of uncontrolled emotions on both sides – writes Alexander Rahr. Trump needs peace in Ukraine for his personal success, while Zelensky needs the war to continue. Neither Trump nor Zelensky can stop there. But maybe each of them had their own scenario? Trump needs to get rid of the annoying Zelensky, who thinks he has the moral authority to demand anything from Western leaders, and at the same time insults them if they do not comply with his wishes. Trump wants a new division of the world, but he will achieve it without Ukraine and without the Europeans.
Now he has a free hand not to play the role of a mediator, but to dictate peace to Ukraine. But Zelensky has achieved his goal: he has definitively separated the Europeans from the United States, isolated Trump in the West. He has successfully dragged the Europeans, irrevocably and deeply into war. He is forcing Europe, which sees him as its “leader” in a “holy war against world evil,” to arm itself to the teeth and supply him with all the weapons it has left in its warehouses, and in addition – to provide it with its soldiers, which it lacks. It will be interesting to watch the rapidly changing Europe. The old world is stuck between the realization that obedience to the US is the law for Europe – and the desire to defeat Russia even at the expense of its economic interests. If Europe is divided on this basis, it will be caused by the reluctance of several countries to go against America. Or the European ruling elites will manage to unite the EU around a new center – Berlin/London/Paris – with the idea of \u200b\u200bstanding against the enemies of democracy, Trump/Putin/Xi Jinping. This is a different concept of Europe, not peaceful, diplomatic, but combative, missionary.
Peter Weiss
