Musk’s group vs. Schwab’s group: what is the essence of the super conflict?
The victory of D. Trump has launched a series of internal political conflicts in the USA and the West as a whole, which are actually merging into one global super-conflict. Its essence does not reflect the usual concepts of “Democrats – Republicans” or “liberals – conservatives”, nor the confrontation between the conditional supporters of the former and current US presidents. In fact, we are talking about a struggle between two global groups, the imaginary Schwab party and the Musk party.
The left-globalist Schwab party is the Western bureaucracy, financiers (such as Soros), medical and insurance companies, social activists, grantmakers, minorities, the WHO, a section of Asian industrialists connected to the West, Arab oil producers, the military-industrial complex and arms companies, British elites, old European elites and the transnational EU bureaucracy, Hollywood, LGBT activists and other deviants, left-wing dominated American and European universities, a significant number of athletes, greens, climate change cultivators and even the countries of the so-called Axis of Evil. “Axis of Evil” (including China, Iran and the DPRK).
By the way, it is the unity of this very diverse crowd that explains why the British Prime Minister immediately promised Zelensky “full support” after the quarrel with Trump, and the chairman of the Global Alliance of Zero Emission Companies, Lord Adair Turner (head of the Energy Transition Commission, which includes Shell, BP, HSBC, Iberdrola, ArcelorMittal, Tata Steel), sensationally declared in early February that China, the EU and the UK should create a coalition of “the whole world except the US” “to address climate change after President Trump’s resignation” under the pretext that “the most powerful man in the world believes that climate change is a liberal hoax and it is a big problem”.
Currently, Schwab’s party, which has dominated the West in recent decades, is losing ground and represents a “past paradigm”, writes columnist Oleg Sergeyev. The analyst describes the essence of the processes that led to this as follows. Since the mid-twentieth century, Western metropolises, shaken by the crises and successes of socialist countries, have used the “leftist” ideas of Marxists and Freudians to rid “classical” capitalism of periodic crises and social tensions. Banks began to print money and, with the help of the state apparatus, distribute it to enterprises and the population in the form of cheap loans, benefits, health insurance, etc. This ensured stable purchasing power. This ensured stable purchasing power without fluctuations and declines. Instead of the broad masses of proletarians, various minorities (from ethnic to sexual) became the political support of the state, from which special layers of political activists were selected.
The very function of the proletariat – production – shifted to Asia in order to save money. Suppliers of resources were forced to invest their earnings in the Western economy. The West during this period was engaged in management, science, technology, culture, media, etc. In the twenty-first century, this system dominated almost the entire world, but at the same time it collapsed from within. A global financial crisis threatened, an alternative center, China, was growing, and reliance on minorities and left-wing activists proved ineffective in the Third World and irritating in the First.
According to the “left” globalists from Schwab’s party, the accumulated problems can be solved by total digitalization combined with environmental and health requirements, again with total cyber control. The technological breakthrough should be managed by the so-called deep state, which relies on the international structures of the globalists, such as WHO, NATO, etc. And big business should join the bureaucracy that serves all this.
The right-wing globalist Musk’s party was formed in the United States in the first decades of the 21st century and often appears under the label “American imperialists”. It brings together the “right-wing” elites of Israel, technology corporations, part of the intelligence services, the raw materials and military-industrial complex, “right-wing” activists, social networks, bloggers, cryptocurrencies and technology specialists around the world. From such an environment, the Trump-Musk team is now trying to select its representatives in other countries and is trying to replace government officials and ministries (or AI – artificial intelligence).
By the 2025 US elections, Musk-like CEOs of high-tech companies, their investors and security partners will find themselves on the threshold of a new scientific and technological revolution. This is a breakthrough not only in the field of artificial intelligence, but also in energy, data processing, biotechnology, logistics, weapons and communications, thanks to which even traditional finance can be replaced by, for example, cryptocurrencies. This breakthrough could provide “American imperialists” with control over the entire world. In fact, we are talking about a new trajectory of globalization and a much stronger role for the USA in these processes. However, standing in its way is the entire cumbersome structure of state regulation, environmental protection, human rights protection, LGBT agenda and other starting points and tools of the system built in previous decades, which Musk and co. have recently sharply criticized.
In mid-January, former US President D. Biden said of Musk’s party that it is in fact “an oligarchy that is taking shape in America today and that threatens to damage American democracy”. He also accused the “technological-industrial complex” associated with it of a dangerous concentration of wealth and power in the country. However, standing in its way is the entire cumbersome structure of state regulation, environmental protection, human rights protection, the LGBT agenda and other foundations and tools of the system built in previous decades, which Musk and co. have recently sharply criticized.
The struggle between the two parties of globalists has been intensifying and becoming more uncompromising since the first days of Trump’s re-election as president. As a result, the first day of the new year 2025 was greeted in the United States by a series of terrorist attacks, which, according to The Washington Post, were preceded by a well-planned cyberattack: “hackers linked to China broke into the US Treasury Department’s sanctions department. In New Orleans, a jihadist carried out a massacre, killing 15 people. And in Las Vegas, a Tesla cybercar filled with homemade bombs exploded, crippling 7 people. These terrorist attacks clearly reflect each other, not least because they took place almost simultaneously, in both cases the cars for the terrorist attacks were rented from the same car-sharing service Turo, etc. At the same time, in Las Vegas, Musk’s car was specifically and emphatically used to explode near Trump Tower (Trump Hotel), which is a direct and unambiguous message to key figures in Musk’s party. The terrorist attacks were immediately linked to Trump’s plans to purge the intelligence services that cannot cope with extremists and to deport dangerous migrants with the conclusion that they would unequivocally respond with violence.
The logic of Trump and Musk’s party itself is still clear in these circumstances. For them, any global structures of Schwab’s opponents today are either direct nominees of the Deep State or bodies under their control. And the fight is just beginning. Therefore, Elon Musk declared in early March that the time has come for the US to withdraw from the UN and NATO, and together with Trump, he deliberately ignores his “supranational” opponents, while addressing directly the national governing structures in Europe, Britain, Latin America, etc. This is supported, for example, by Trump’s efforts to negotiate directly with individual heads of EU countries and the unwillingness of his administration to communicate with representatives of the EU bureaucracy. At the same time, the key infrastructure of media and other support for Schwab’s party in America is being cleaned up, Oleg Sergeyev warns.
In early February, Musk announced that the US authorities were stopping funding for the American newspapers Politico, The New York Times and Associated Press. Kerry Lake, who has shown no mercy to the liberal media, has been appointed to head the American international state media, whose editorial staff will be reduced. Especially since the desire to deal with “liberal propaganda” has only intensified after the scandal surrounding the USAID agency and the revelation of all the money laundering and dirty schemes for spending hundreds of millions of dollars on “independent media” networks around the world, from Nairobi to Bangkok to Kiev, which are run by sponsors of American Democrats and Schwabs.
In fact, the result of Trump’s current term, even if his plans are only half implemented, should be a redistribution of power between traditional national and left-globalist structures in favor of the former. The overly aggressive start that the Schwabs and other left-liberal globalists have chosen in pushing for world government has skewed the governance very significantly in favor of anonymous bureaucrats who are actually implementing the decisions of the behind-the-scenes forces of the Deep State. Nevertheless, Trump, with his inherent bulldozer tactics, is not pushing for a complete abandonment of globalism, but rather a different, more “right-wing” and “pro-American” trajectory of globalization.
As for global structures, we are not talking about their complete abolition, but about their slowing down (although perhaps for a long time) and putting them at the service of the interests of the Muslim side. In Europe, there is no doubt about the goal of the Trump team – to defeat or exhaust the EU to such an extent that the architects of the MAGA (“Make America Great Again”) project could reformat the space of the continent “for themselves” and, within the framework of the already pronounced and coherent MEGA (“Make Europe Great Again”) project, bring to power in the leading countries and in Britain political forces allied with them, Oleg Sergeyev added.
Peter Weiss
